Social Communication On The Air – It’s A Perfect Match

I came across a really good blog last week titled “Why Aren’t More Radio Stations Being Social?” by Justin Kings who is an International media consultant, trainer and broadcaster. He is also, like me, a radio professional who bemoans the way in which broadcast organisations and broadcasters themselves use Social platforms. It reminded me of a blog I wrote last year called “Why Is Radio Still Underusing Twitter?

It was interesting to read the comments that accompanied Justin’s blog on the Radio Today website because they spoke of the “lack of visible replies” and that they only get “regular contributors”. This implies it’s the fault of the platform when in fact, as always, it’s the quality and creativity of the content and the way it’s sold on the air.

Listeners to a radio station are there to be enticed and teased, to listen a little longer when they really should be doing something else, to force them to visit that web page, to give that video one more view, to send that text to add a few pence to the coffers. Good presenters along with entertaining and creative content can do all of that.

Does that seems familiar in any way?

That’s exactly what Social communication does too.

When I’m talking to businesses and organisations about how they use Social platforms I use strategies and principles from three decades as a successful radio presenter because the parallels are obvious and valid. After all we are talking about “live broadcasting” in the most part. Social communication like traditional radio broadcasts is sent out to an audience (community) but at the point of contact is 1-2-1 so it becomes a very personal medium.

This where Justin and I speak with one voice when we talk about how poorly radio in general uses these digital channels to accompany and enhance their output. You would think that if any business would understand 1-2-1 communication it would be radio.

I discovered Twitter in 2009 and grasped the opportunity to use it straight away. It was the first time I could talk to my audience outside of show times. I was able to strengthen the relationship I already had with them, share extra content with them, take them behind-the-scenes (listeners love that) and give them stuff they couldn’t get just by listening to my show. I could also make someone who wasn’t already listening tune in, that’s as powerful as it gets.

Nick Machin tweet

Former BBC 5 Live presenter Richard Bacon’s once described Twitter as being like “the DVD Extras of a radio programme”. That’s a perfect analogy.

Of course radio shouldn’t only use Social channels to get material for use on air, the marketing possibilities are many and varied. You can talk about today’s show, tease ahead for tomorrow, highlight news items, showcase station contests and promotions, take people behind-the-scenes, post links to the station website and other Social channels, give the listener those “DVD Extras” and importantly…..have fun.

There is another positive to be gained from regular monitoring and engagement with Social Media platforms and that is the ability to provide gold standard customer service. There is also one thing you can do which doesn’t take long but will strengthen your customer service reputation. Justin mentions it in his blog, an American marketer called Gary Vaynerchuck has written a book about it and I talk about regularly in my sessions.

Just say “Thank You”.

Two words that acknowledge you appreciate that tweet or post or picture and will validate the time and effort the listener has taken to create and send it.

Having said all of that there has to be the urge and motivation to do it. The radio stations who are gaining most from their Social Media platforms are the ones who have developed a strategy for content creation and monitoring. They are the ones who have recognised that Social communication is no longer something to do if someone has time to knock up a Facebook post or two. It’s now firmly part of any communications business portfolio.

Social Media platforms are perfect tools for building and maintaining relationships and trust with a community. The fact that the experts in 1-2-1 communication are, in many circumstances, using those tools in a very unimaginative, ad-hoc manner is baffling.

Disclaiming the Disclaimer

You’ve probably seen hundreds of them; you may even have one of our own on your Twitter bio.

all views

Yes it’s the disclaimer; the one above is what’s opted for in many cases, however sometimes users get a bit creative.

Screen shot 2012-04-25 at 7.27.30 AM

After all these years there is still a general belief that these disclaimers in a Twitter profile somehow bestow a suit of armour if a problem arises with any dubious content issued from that person’s account.

It doesn’t matter how they phrased, a Twitter disclaimer is about as much use as an underwater hairdryer.

I don’t know where or when the disclaimer was born but like anything that gets repeated over and over again, the perception becomes reality.

To give it a legal comparison it’s like the word “allegedly” which is still thought of as a shield if used before a libellous or defamatory comment. Again, this is a popular misconception but still widely believed.

The main man in legal training for radio folk is Paul Chantler, he says this about that word

“For example, despite what you may have been led to believe by ‘Have I Got News For You?, the word “allegedly” is not a defence against a possible libel action; if anything it just digs you even deeper into the hole in which you’ve dug yourself. In libel cases, the burden of proof is on the defendant, so by using “allegedly”, you are, in effect, admitting you are not totally sure of the facts, and, therefore, have no adequate defence”.

The same thing applies to the Twitter disclaimer.

We shouldn’t need a form of words on our bio to protect us from our own ideas and thoughts being published on a public forum. All we need is to take responsibility for our opinions for that is what they are; they cannot be anyone else’s.

You will occasionally see another disclaimer on a Twitter profile which declares that :-

“Re-tweets are not endorsements”

My argument is that that is EXACTLY what they are. What else could they be, unless you add a caveat to the tweet you are sharing you can expect the content to be taken as something you not only agree with, but agree with enough to share with your own Twitter community.

Here’s a story that grabbed my attention in the last couple of days featuring a tweet from Geoffrey Miller, a Psychologist at the University of New Mexico.

He declared via Twitter :-

screen-shot-obese-phd

A rumpus quickly ensued as you would expect and with every justification, as unless he’s done research into both the correlation of willpower relating to the intake of carbohydrates and the impetus to complete a dissertation, he’s on shaky ground. Love the hashtag too, as if that’s enough proof to justify the preceding comments.

He soon responded to the criticism he was getting by explaining it was all part of a research program to gauge Twitter reaction to provocative comments. I suppose we should give him credit for trying to come up with something more creative than “I had my account hacked”, but once he realised we weren’t all born yesterday, he issued a disclaimer AGAINST HIS OWN OPINION.

article-2335177-1A20BCA5000005DC-700_634x286

It’s another example of the way an ill-judged, bone-headed Social Media posting can not only come back and bite you in the backside, but not be happy until it’s eaten your trousers too.

The way to avoid these embarrassing episodes is not to indulge in meaningless copy and paste disclaimers but to be measured, thoughtful and considered.

A tweet can take seconds to share but the impact and damage of a poorly judged post can stay with you for a lifetime.